Bondathon: For Your Eyes Only
It’s plain and obvious that Moonraker was a disaster, and no
one knew it more than EON productions. After hearing the reviews and starting
to notice just how much they jumped the shark, they quickly re-evaluated the
James Bond situation, and the first solution was to find a new actor for the
role. By 1980, Moore was starting to show his age, and everyone knew that soon,
he would have to step down from the role (which he ended up not doing until
1985). So, EON started playing around with new actors, but had no luck finding
anyone who was available or wanted to play the role. So, Moore ended up coming
back, and they just decided to take a more serious and down to earth tone with
this next entry: For Your Eyes Only.
The film largely deals with Bond investigating the sinking
of a British government ship named the St. Georges (which housed a very
important missile guiding device known as the ATAC), and the sudden death of
the last man to see her: a marine biologist known as Havelock. As he checks out
Havelock’s killer, Gonzales’s villa, he comes across a man who paid Gonzale
known as Emile Locque, wearing a dove pin which is revealed as the sign that he
works for a man named Columbo (Topol), as revealed by Kristatos (Julian
Glover). Along the way he meets Havelock’s
daughter Melina (Carole Bouquet), who’s out to get revenge on her father’s
death. Eventually we find that Kristatos is the man behind it all, wanting to
get the ATAC device found on the ship for himself. Bond, Columbo and Melina
team up to take Kristatos down, killing Emile Locque along the way, and
discovering that Kristatos has intentions to sell the ATAC device to the USSR,
who would use it to control British missiles and possibly release world
destruction. However, Bond eventually makes it to Kristatos, with aid of
Columbo, and kills him, taking the ATAC for himself. The film ends with Bond
throwing the device off a cliff, claiming, “détente,” to the USSR’s General
Gogol.
I honestly can say with a straight face that this is my
favorite film coming out of the Roger Moore era. I like the dark tone that it
wore, and many of the scenes (including the death of Emile Locque, which
involved Bond kicking his car off of a cliff in cold blood) fit a more
realistic edge not found with most other Moore films. However, the movie isn’t
without its comedic moments, most of which are well maintained, and don’t
really upstage the settings and the events happening on screen, unlike
Moonraker, that seemed to be more about the slapstick than anything.
The casting of the film is also well done. Moore is
fantastic this time around as Bond, and even though he’s starting to show his
age by this point, he manages to still pull off a rather dapper detective in
most scenes. Julian Glover has always been one of my favorite actors in classic
cinema, and it’s no different here. While he doesn’t particularly look very
sinister, he pulls off being a double agent so brilliantly…it’s almost a
precursor to his role in Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade eight years later. Precision
acting from Carole Bouquet and Topol also have a hand in making this one of the
best ensembles in a Bond film for a long, long while. There’s no absence of talent in anyone.
You may have guessed that I’m giving For Your Eyes Only a
5/5 stars. You have guessed correctly. I love it when Bond takes a darker image
like this, because it shows some depth of reality to the character, and it kind
of shows how such an event could possibly happen any day in this world. Very,
very nicely done…if only you can keep it up. Such is the life of the Moore
Bonds.
Comments
Post a Comment